The Problem

Why AIDLC?

Faster delivery
Tens of dollars per feature, hours of elapsed time. Not weeks.

Built-in compliance
Every action audited. Every dollar attributed to an issue.

Institutional memory
The pipeline learns. The org's knowledge stops walking out the door.

Faster onboarding
New engineers ramp on a pipeline that already knows the codebase. 

A pipeline that improves
Each cycle's retro feeds the next cycle's configuration.

Humans stay in control
Agents propose. Humans approve. Every merge is gated.

Problems

Why AIDLC?

Observability Standard

OpenTelemetry:
Baked in, not bolted on

We instrument every migrated workload with OpenTelemetry from day one, giving you vendor-neutral traces, metrics, and logs across your entire estate.
What we wire up on every engagement

Auto-instrumentation of .NET and Java services → ADOT collector sidecars on EKS → AWS X-Ray for distributed tracing → CloudWatch for metrics and logs → custom dashboards and SLO alerting. All traces, metrics, and logs flow through a single OTel pipeline, swap backends without re-instrumenting.

VM → Container replatforming

Move off bare VMs onto EKS with proper orchestration, autoscaling, and workload isolation.

Custom metrics

Business and technical KPIs exported via OTel metrics SDK to CloudWatch and Managed Prometheus.

Structured logging

JSON-structured logs with trace correlation IDs, shipped to CloudWatch Logs Insights.

SLO alerting

Composite alarms and SLO burn-rate alerts wired from day one not as an afterthought.

Before & After

What changes in your architecture

Before
Monolithic .NET / Java app on VMs
After
Containerized microservices on EKS
Before
Self-managed relational DB on EC2
After
Amazon Aurora / RDS with redesigned schema
Before
On-prem RabbitMQ / ActiveMQ
After
Amazon SQS / MSK / EventBridge
Before
No distributed tracing or correlation
After
Full OTel traces, metrics, and logs
Before
Single AWS account, manual IAM
After
AWS Control Tower multi-account with guardrails
Before
Manual deployments, no CI/CD
After
GitOps pipelines with ArgoCD / CodePipeline
Enterprise Scale

AWS Landing Zone & multi-account governance

Security and compliance are not a phase, they are the foundation. We deploy enterprise-grade account structures that satisfy the most demanding regulatory requirements.
Outcomes

Measurable results our clients achieve

60-80%
infrastructure cost reduction vs on-prem VMs

10x
faster deployments via GitOps pipelines

99.9%+
availability through EKS self-healing & multi-AZ

<5 min
MTTR with full OTel trace-to-log correlation

Case Study

Mobile Test Automation on Transformation and SaaS Device Farm Integration Service

80%
Average automation coverage

1,200+
Test cases automated

24–36×
Faster test execution

300+
Builds per month

Situation

Yıldız Tech is the digital innovation and R&D center of Yıldız Holding, designated as an On-Site R&D Center. It builds technology for Yıldız Holding brands and external companies, with a focus on e-commerce. Two brands anchored this project. İstegelsin is Türkiye's first fully online supermarket. Şok is a retailer with 9,500+ stores, 31 warehouses, and 40,000+ employees, with mobile shopping running on the Cepte Şok app.

Yıldız Tech runs many projects in parallel. Testing them was fully manual, and the team had no existing test automation projects. Release cycles were slowed by manual regression, and there was no shared infrastructure to make testing faster or more stable.

Task

Yıldız Tech needed a test automation infrastructure built from scratch. The first scope covered İstegelsin: four projects (Web, Android, iOS, API) on a 6-month roadmap. Once mature, the same setup would extend to the internal Cepte Şok applications.

Two constraints shaped the toolset decision:

  • The stack had to cover everything İstegelsin needed and stay tailor-made to their applications.
  • The internal Yıldız Tech test team, including members who had never written automation tests, had to adapt and contribute quickly.

Action

Architecture

We ran POCs across language and framework combinations, then locked the stack per project:

  • Web: Ruby + Capybara
  • Android: Ruby + Appium
  • iOS: Ruby + Appium
  • API: Java + Karate

Methodology

We ran Scrum with 2-week sprints, tracked work on a Jira board, and held daily meetings, groomings, sprint reviews, and retrospectives. We started with smoke test cases, defined together with the internal team. Smoke cases cover core business functionality and, once built, produce a strengthened project structure, reusable functions, data and reporting integration points, and shared coding conventions.

Development

We built test architectures for Web, Android, iOS, and API, with defined standards for Cucumber test writing, variables, and tag naming. We used a BDD approach so test steps read as plain English and stay readable outside the dev team. The architectures run as a distributed system, executing tests in parallel across browser and device instances. To cut repetitive code, we built a private Ruby gem that generates test data (user info, cart, payment) dynamically at runtime, covering 150+ test data needs. We ran onboarding sessions (web element inspection, Git, Ruby, Capybara, Karate, Appium) and documented everything on Confluence.

CI/CD

Once coverage passed the 30% threshold, we built Jenkins pipeline architecture for Web and API projects, able to run Smoke, Regression, Production, or feature-specific suites. Test-environment builds trigger automatically and report results to a dedicated Slack channel. Smoke cases run every morning. Production cases run daily after deployment. We added the whole project team to the report groups, so every stakeholder sees results and broken features get tracked down faster.

Mobile Device Farm

We handled two integrations in parallel:

  • Dynamic app management: we connected Bitrise so apps download and install automatically by specific or last successful build version.
  • Device farm: after multiple POCs, the client chose the digital.ai Continuous Testing platform, which let us bring mobile projects into the CI/CD pipeline.

Load Tests

After UI and API progress, we built load test scripts with Karate + Gatling, generated the required data dynamically, and set up an architecture the whole team can run.

Results

One year of work delivered across the company:

  • 3 API test automation projects
  • 3 Android test automation projects
  • 2 Web test automation projects
  • 2 data management projects
  • 1 iOS test automation project

Measurable outcomes:

  • 80% average test case automation coverage per project
  • 1,200+ test cases covered
  • 30+ pipeline scripts by test type
  • Custom data gem covering 150+ test data needs
  • Parallel architecture cuts 2-3 day test runs down to a maximum of 2 hours
  • 300+ builds per month through scheduled and triggered runs

Case Studies

Let's Work Together