Beyond Instrumentation
OpenTelemetry (OTel) Solves Collection,
Not Resolution
If your team spends 90% of an outage trying to work out which layer is failing, the problem isn't your telemetry. It's your correlation. Kloia turns OpenTelemetry into a correlated engine for root cause analysis, so your engineers and your AI systems are never working from half the story.
|
Problem: The Siloed Trace
|
Solution: Full-Stack Correlation
|
Why OpenTelemetry Alone
Isn't Enough
By engineering the OpenTelemetry Collector to enrich data before it reaches your backend, the reason something broke is already answered by the time the alert fires.
Application To Infrastructure
Linking the trace to the specific resource, CPU, memory, or IO, that it actually consumed.
Frontend To Backend
Linking the user's browser experience to the backend database query behind it.
Synthetics To Reality
Using synthetic tests to confirm that the correlated path is actually healthy.
Basic OTel vs.
Kloia-Correlated OTel
| Feature | Basic OTel deployment |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | "Service A is slow." |
|
||
| RCA speed | Manual, across multiple dashboards |
|
||
| Enterprise backend | Disconnected traces |
|
||
| End-user impact | Isolated symptoms |
|
Questions We Hear From C-Level Teams
Doesn't Datadog or Instana already support OpenTelemetry? Why do we need a correlation strategy?
We want to reduce vendor lock-in. Is OTel enough on its own?
How does this affect our AIOps and automated root cause analysis?
Will OpenTelemetry increase our resource overhead or cloud costs?
Is OpenTelemetry mature enough for our mission-critical enterprise apps?
Why not just wait for our current vendor's next-generation agent?