Search:

Company-aware
AI workflows
for your delivery lifecycle

AIDLC helps organizations bring AI into their delivery process in a controlled, context-aware and measurable way.

We design and implement AI workflows around the real context of each project: codebases, documentation, Jira issues, architecture decisions, coding standards, business rules, onboarding materials, operational runbooks or customer-specific knowledge bases.

The goal is to make AI useful across the delivery lifecycle, from planning and modernization to development, QA, DevOps, review and operations.

from a 90-day pilot

50

PRs / code changes checked against project-specific rules

75

test scenarios generated or reviewed with AI support

15

deployment / release checks validated against defined standards

1-2wk

to build knowledge base

WHAT IS AIDLC

AIDLC is a consulting-led implementation framework for integrating AI into the delivery lifecycle.

We work with each customer to identify where AI can create the most value, then design the right context layer, workflows and governance model around that need.

This can mean supporting legacy modernization, improving QA and review processes, helping DevOps teams validate operational changes, or making engineering knowledge reusable across teams.

Built For

Any company developing software that wants to execute a controlled AI rollout. Especially organizations going through major transformation, operating in regulated sectors, or running large engineering teams.

What It Is Not

AIDLC is not a fixed tool or a generic prompt library. It is adapted to the customer's delivery process, available knowledge sources and business constraints.

Best Suited For

Engineering teams of 50+. Smaller teams? We have a focused starter package - ask us about it.

THE PROBLEM

Four things breaking your AI rollout right now.

Problem 01

Your AI tools do not know your company.

Copilot, Cursor, and similar tools know general coding. They do not know your ADRs, your deprecation list, your target architecture, or your business rules. Your team pastes the same context into prompts every single day.

Fix AIDLC moves this context to a permanent, versioned foundation that flows automatically into every phase.

Problem 02

AI output is unaudited and potentially non-compliant.

Is the generated code compliant with company standards? Who is checking? In regulated sectors, this question cannot go unanswered. Anyone who says it can is either not in a regulated sector or has not shipped yet.

Fix AIDLC auto-checks every AI output against your written policies, blocks violations, cites the rule, and leaves an audit trail.

Problem 03

Institutional knowledge lives in people's heads - until it does not.

Architecture decisions, service dependencies, onboarding knowledge - all locked in senior engineers' heads. When they leave, a new team member or your AI makes the same mistake from scratch. Again.

Fix AIDLC pulls this knowledge into a queryable, living foundation. Critical decisions, validated learnings, reusable standards and approved context updates are captured in the system.

Problem 04

AI adoption stalls after the pilot.

Individual tools work. Enterprise rollout fails. Every team writes its own prompts. Standards are not kept. Nobody can measure what is actually working. You have a hundred AI experiments and no system.

Fix AIDLC's meta-loop layer observes the pipeline, reports patterns to humans, and the system gets better over time - not just deployed and forgotten.

HOW IT WORKS

Four steps. One system that does not fight you.

01

Enterprise Context Foundation

Confluence, source repos, ADRs, target architecture, business rules, and past decisions are connected via read-only connectors / integrations, MCP where applicable.

02

AI Agents Embedded in the Pipeline

Define, Refine, Build, Review, Ship, Operate, Learn - AI agents (skills) fed with your company context are integrated at each phase. Each phase output becomes the next phase input.

Define
Refine
Build
Review
Ship
Operate
Learn
03

Compliance Layer Audits Every Output

Every AI output is automatically checked against your written rules: ADRs, security policies, coding standards, deprecation lists. If there is a violation, it is blocked, and the rule reference is shown. Audit trail is created automatically.

04

Meta-Loop Improves the System

The pipeline watches itself. Which rule was violated most? Which AI output was rejected? Where was context missing? Reported weekly to humans. Humans decide. System updates. It is not AI fixing AI - it is AI informing humans.

Why AIDLC

What you actually get out of it.

Faster Delivery
Because conventions and dependencies are known to the AI, PR review cycles get shorter and repeated corrections decrease. Less time explaining context that should already be in the system.
Built-In Compliance
Every AI output is automatically audited against company policies. In regulated sectors, the audit trail is generated without anyone having to remember to do it.
Institutional Memory
Decisions made, trade-offs considered, lessons learned - all written into the system. The knowledge does not leave when the engineer does.
Faster Onboarding
New team members - or AI - do not have to learn your architecture and standards from scratch. It is already in the system. Day one looks a lot less like a treasure hunt.
A Pipeline That Gets Better
The meta-loop means the system adapts to your language and processes over time. It is not a static tool you deploy and leave. It learns - and it tells you what it learned.
Humans Stay in Control
AI does not decide. It suggests and audits. Critical decisions always go to human review. No "AI fixing AI." The loop always ends with a person making a call.
USE CASES

Where it fits in the real world.

01

Legacy Platform Modernization

AIDLC is especially valuable in legacy modernization programs where teams need to understand large codebases, dependencies, architectural constraints and business rules before making transformation decisions.

It can support modernization assessment, risk identification, dependency discovery, target-state alignment, backlog preparation and Proof of Value planning.

This helps teams move from unclear legacy complexity to a more evidence-based modernization roadmap.

02

QA and test design

AIDLC can help QA teams generate, review and improve test scenarios using acceptance criteria, product rules, historical defects and platform-specific expectations.

03

DevOps and release readiness

AIDLC can support DevOps teams by checking deployment plans, runbooks, configuration changes and operational risks against defined delivery standards.

04

Engineering governance

AIDLC can help engineering teams apply architecture decisions, coding standards, deprecation rules and security policies more consistently across delivery workflows.

The questions we actually get asked.

  • No. AIDLC complements your existing tools rather than replacing them. It integrates with your systems in a read-only capacity and does not write back to your data by default. Any updates to the knowledge base or context are managed through controlled and approved workflows.
  • A pilot setup is typically running within 4 to 6 weeks. The first phase focuses on 1 to 2 selected DLC stages; scope expands from there based on what you learn. No need to commit to the entire lifecycle upfront.
  • It was specifically designed with this in mind. The compliance layer generates audit trails automatically, the human-in-the-loop approach is preserved throughout, and no critical decision passes without human approval. If you are in banking, healthcare, or insurance, this is the version built for you.
  • Yes. AIDLC is model-agnostic by design. AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, and on-premise models are all supported. If your data cannot leave your environment, it does not have to.
  • AIDLC creates the most value in engineering teams of 50 or more. For smaller teams, we offer a more focused starter package. Worth a conversation - sometimes smaller teams have bigger compliance headaches than large ones.
  • By default it produces a weekly summary, but it can be configured for daily or sprint-based reporting based on your organization's preference. The summary goes to humans. Humans decide what to update. The system does not self-modify without approval.

Let's have a call.

No sales pitch. Just a look at your architecture to see where it might explode.