The era of working onsite 9-5 had ended a long time ago, but it seems that businesses are taking their time to accept this reality...
The bigger question is not Remote or not; it is: “Are you ready to implement a decoupled working model that does not require people to work synchronously all the time?”. There has been an increase in autonomy, loose interdependencies and so-called two-pizza teams together with the Microservices movement. Is it really impossible to give asynchronous, online daily scrum feedback?
Let’s consider Onsite vs. Remote which has a similar pattern with Sync vs Async. Does switching from face-to-face to Zoom help with the ultimate target of being Remote? Before giving the Remote decision strategically, one needs to consider several dimensions within the entity including communication, decision-making, organisation… Let’s focus on to the communication first:
There are two main types of communication:
More Async, less Sync is one of the major key success criteria of the Remote.
`GNU is not UNIX`, likewise `Remote is not Zoom`
Remote is a trade-off. On one side, you risk losing some efficiency because of less control. On the other side, you increase efficiency by:
No doubt that sync communication has advantages when there are ambiguities and uncertainties. Furthermore, the initial face-to-face sync session is sometimes a traditional culture to overcome mistrust. So after the trust issue is solved, is there any major reason left for face-to-face conversations?
Linus Torvalds has an incredibly strict view on Remote Working. He has pointed out the success of Linux, the “Biggest Remote Async OpenSource Project”, comes from its efficiency because the contributors do not lose time to follow the face-to-face requirements, such as greetings, welcomes and similar cultural rules. Instead, the contributors provide direct, written feedback asynchronously. . This successful system created the most used operating system on servers and mobiles worldwide!
How come the success of Linux is still ignored by the companies who are still enforcing a working culture from the 80s?
Working side-by-side can be seen as more effective, but it also has a risk to create laziness in certain cultures. In certain conditions, onsite work can relatively favour being more reactive rather than proactive. By working remotely with well-defined targets, there is:
As Kloia, we have been working remotely for 5 years now but remote work for us does not necessarily mean being at home. We strongly encourage Kloians to use our own offices, co-working spaces (i.e. Wework, Workinton) and any remote location that they feel they will be productive and creative, instead of staying at home 5 days a week. This is our reasoning:
Some Kloians even decided to stay long-term in another country and that’s totally fine for us! This was an opportunity to practice their English and work remotely meanwhile.
I was told many times: “This process/task is not remotely possible” and I have asked the same question each time: “Define what is not possible”. The answer usually did not require to be onsite.
We are constantly debating and exploring the best ways to hold remote sessions. For instance, “Event Storming” is an activity where side-by-side interaction with Post-its is strongly recommended. But wait! A remote event storming session may still be possible if you can adapt it! Switching to remote does not necessarily mean to replace the side-to-side sessions with an online website where you can interactively play with Post-its! Just find another way of achieving the target!
Remote Tips
Being remote, now you may need to rely on your daily calendar more than ever! Your daily routine can be defined in your calendar, which means fewer or no spontaneous meetings! Mark your preferred focus time slots on your calendar. Enjoy the remote disruption-free environment, which you can never find in an office environment!
There are also challenges with working remotely, especially in traditional cultures where, consciously or not, the people are overseen during the day by various stakeholders like CxO, PM, customer... Those stakeholders usually do not participate in daily standups or to the internal regular meetings but still want to keep an eye on you. They believe that success comes with pushing, rather than facilitating self-motivation. To overcome those, my suggestions are:
Whichever async messaging tool you are using, try to keep your status up-to-date, like away, in a meeting, lunch, so that whoever is messaging you will be aware that an instant response will not be possible.
While I insist that many of your current sync communication can be replaced with Async communication, this does not mean that sync communications will disappear. You still need to be ready for video sessions.
Some tips:
Having hassle-free video calls with clear video makes remote work a lot more engaging. The following are some of my technical suggestions for video calls remote work:
Stress on the Organisational Structures
Working remotely is a major change and you cannot keep the same 80s model hierarchical organisation same with that major change.
As an alternative model, you can consider Holacracy. There are pros/cons in that model, but maybe that will reflect your approach better than a traditional hierarchical model.
If you
Challenges Ahead, But They Are Worth It
Shifting to a successful remote culture requires you also to assess and tune your processes to be remote-friendly. This adjustment mainly revolves around replacing sync communication with async where it makes sense. This movement may require your team/organisation structure and accountability to be reassessed too. One major challenge is changing the daily cultural habits, where 9-5 converts into a flexible regime. And don’t forget: Remote ≠ Home!
As Kloia, we embrace the remote working model successfully since 2016. It had challenges, but considering where we are standing now, it was worth overcoming those challenges for a better, more satisfying work environment.